Lisa Zaar vs Caijsa Wilda Hennemann Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 01 Jul at 02:53 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Zaar vs C. Wilda Hennemann

SWE
1
Win
Played
1
Win

SWE
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Zaar 1 - 1 Hennemann
They have played 5 sets in total, with Lisa Zaar winning 3 and Caijsa Wilda Hennemann winning 2. The last match between Caijsa Wilda Hennemann and Lisa Zaar was at the W35 Amstelveen, 01-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Caijsa Wilda Hennemann getting the victory 6-7(0) 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Zaar | 1 |
| Hennemann | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Amstelveen(07-01-25)
(R1) W25 Danderyd(08-10-22)
L. Zaar vs C. W. Hennemann H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 58.29% (116-83) | Career Total W/L | 64.94% (200-108) |
| 1 | Clay | 1 |
| 2 | Titles | 10 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0.00% (0-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
L. Zaar vs C. W. Hennemann Match Preview:
- Second serve efficiency shows Zaar winning 37.08% of points, significantly surpassing Hennemann's 17.2%. Could this stronger performance give Zaar the upper hand?
- In recent return game stats, Hennemann excels by winning 61.39% of their opponent's second serve points, compared to Zaar's 53.81%.
- For first serve returns, Hennemann again has an advantage with 57.59% compared to Zaar's 39.29%. How crucial will this edge be in the match?
- Break point resilience is incredibly close, with Zaar saving 47.89%, just slightly lower than Hennemann's 50%.
- In the past year, Hennemann has a higher win rate of 66.67% versus Zaar's 61.11%.
- Zaar's best career win percentage is on indoor hard courts (59%), while Hennemann prefers hard surfaces with a career win rate of 64%.
- In Challenger/ITF events > $10K, Hennemann has a better win percentage (66.67%) compared to Zaar's 58.82% over the past year.
- Their direct head-to-head record favors Zaar, who has won their only match against Hennemann.
- Zaar's opponents have been slightly higher ranked on average (410.58) than those Hennemann has faced (457.11) over the last 12 months.
- When matches go to a deciding set, Hennemann boasts a better record, winning 67% compared to Zaar's 57% in the past year.
- Hennemann currently shows superior breakpoint conversion at 60% against Zaar's 43.89%.
Editorial Prediction (July 1, 2025, UTC):
This upcoming match between Zaar and Hennemann promises to be an intriguing contest. Zaar has demonstrated superior second serve performance, which could prove pivotal in maintaining service games.
However, Hennemann has shown a formidable ability in return games and breakpoint conversions. This strength could be critical in overturning Zaar's service advantage.
Moreover, Hennemann's more favorable performance in deciding sets suggests a resilience that might give them an edge if the match becomes closely contested.
Taking into account all these factors, Hennemann edges out as the likely winner for this upcoming match, leveraging their return game and clutch performance under pressure to secure victory.
Lisa Zaar vs Caijsa Wilda Hennemann Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Zaar vs C. W. Hennemann H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 24 | Games Won | 26 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:36:28 | Average Match Time | 2:36:28 |
| 72% (104/144) | 1st Serve % | 65% (106/164) |
| 56% (58/104) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (58/106) |
| 50% (20/40) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (24/58) |
| 46% (11/24) | Break Pts Won % | 71% (12/17) |
| 50% (82/164) | Return Points Win % | 46% (66/144) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Zaar Recent Matches Played
C. W. Hennemann Recent Matches Played

L. Zaar vs C. W. Hennemann Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.29% (116/83) | YTD Win/Loss | 64.94% (200/108) |
| 56.55% (259/199) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.66% (431/268) |
| 53.31% (2237/1959) | Games Win/Loss | 55.16% (3450/2805) |
| 58.93% (33/23) | Hard Win/Loss | 63.64% (14/8) |
| 57.89% (66/48) | Clay Win/Loss | 65.25% (154/82) |
| 58.62% (17/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64.00% (32/18) |
| 0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 29 | Aces Total | 247 |
| 0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 740 | Total Double Faults | 503 |
| 1:41:15 | Average Match Time | 1:34:3 |
| 434.86 | Average Opponent Rank | 498.57 |
| 73% (8603/11815) | 1st Serve % | 67% (12044/17997) |
| 56% (4843/8603) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (6878/12044) |
| 42% (1341/3212) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (2809/5971) |
| 51% (873/1705) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (1269/2458) |
| 51% (5933/11741) | Return Points Win % | 50% (8615/17370) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Cups W/L | 60.00% (9/6) |
| 55.64% (74/59) | Challenger W/L | 56.69% (89/68) |
| 66.67% (42/21) | Futures W/L | 75.00% (102/34) |
| 59% (115/196) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (197/305) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 54% (27/50) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (26/45) |
| 57% (36/63) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (51/84) |
| 88% (114/100) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (198/175) |
| 11% (114/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (198/23) |
| 19% (85/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (110/25) |